Student Solution

-->

"Education is the most powerful weapon which you can use to change the world”
– Nelson Mandela

1 University

1 Course

1 Subject

Download Solution

Related Solution

Module 5 Assignment...
Communism party is the major driving and dominant force in China, this is a both a benefit and disadvantage for the country, as it has helped in developing a stable and dynamic economy, revolutionizin...

Module 5 Assignment - Milestone 2
Module 5 Assignment - Milestone 2

Communism party is the major driving and dominant

Week 5 Quiz_16784310...
1.True 2.True 3.False 4.False 5.6.9%

Week 5 Quiz
Week 5 Quiz

1.True 2.True 3.False 4.False 5.6.9%

3-2 Milestone One_16...
The upcoming office in Fayetteville, NC is set to accommodate 50 employees, including the recently hired executive vice president of sales and marketing. The network infrastructure must meet certain r...

3-2 Milestone One
3-2 Milestone One

The upcoming office in Fayetteville, NC is set to

Written Case Analysis 6

Written Case Analysis 6

Q For this module, you are required to complete a Written Case Analysis (200 words). Please read Thinking Critically About Ethical Issues, Case 11, p. 120. Identify the moral issue(s) and the parties involved; identify what virtues are at stake or which relationships of care are at stake. Submit your assignment to the Written Case Analysis 6 Assignment basket no later than Sunday 11:59 PM EST/EDT. (This Assignment may be linked to Turnitin.) When you save your document, please make sure it includes the format: “Firstname Lastname–WCA6"

View Related Questions

Solution Preview

View Complete Solution
In this case, the parties involved are the sociologist and the people in the urban slum. The moral issue at stake is whether the sociologist was wrong for not telling the police about the people within the slum community that are car thieves. The sociologist has gain access through her maintaining loyalty in order to receive the information she needs. The text does not state whether or not she actually has evidence in order to go to the police or was this mere hearsay. I would say that morally if she had evidence of a particular case then she may have been compelled to go to authorities but with Ethics of care there are no universal laws or truths and each scenario is based on particular situations in order to dictate the specific needs and/or interests of the individual(s) involved.